Home > Events > Criticized Queen Out-Lives Victoria

Criticized Queen Out-Lives Victoria

30, December, 2007 Discuss it What they said

I lied. I had to post this before getting cracking on my U.S. government class.

The week of Dec. 24th, 2007 saw HM Elizabeth II surpass Queen Victoria to become Britain’s longest-living monarch.

It is an historic time, but also a time for criticism, apparently. At least if you’re David Starkey.

Starkey, a well-known royal historian who has been declared “The Rudest Man In Britain”, recently commented on the Queen in the Guardian.

“I think she’s got elements a bit like Goebbels in her attitude to culture,” Starkey told the republican newspaper. “…I suppose it’s this absence of any kind of, to be blunt, serious education.”

The interview with Starkey, unimaginatively titled “The Queen and I” , refers to the days of King George V who changed the family name to Windsor, shifting them away from their German connections and giving them more of an “English” look. George V’s changes helped keep the monarchy running, and Starkey insinuates that if the Queen doesn’t do something just as ground-breaking in her family, all will turn to choking dust and disappear on the wind. First up: get a “serious” education for Her Majesty.

Starkey even suggests that the monarchy should remove itself from the Church of England and – contrary to many opinions – look to Prince Charles as their best hope for survival.

Read his interview, then send me your thoughts via email or comment here at the blog!

So, is he to be called David “Snarkey” now, or do you agree with him?

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • http://www.mandysroyalty.org Mandy

    That’s true, people do make careers out of controversy. “The Rudest Man In Britain” may not be the most ideal title to some, but Starkey is getting his media attention, isn’t he? :-)

  • http://www.mandysroyalty.org/ Mandy

    That’s true, people do make careers out of controversy. “The Rudest Man In Britain” may not be the most ideal title to some, but Starkey is getting his media attention, isn’t he? :-)

  • http://www.webwritereditor.com Lisa

    Hello Mandy,
    I don’t agree with him at all and I think that Starkey tends to take the easy way out in his history which is pretty simplified, so he shouldn’t comment like this! He didn’t discuss whether Richard III really murdered the two princes, for example – he just took it as read.

    I agree that Prince Charles probably is more intellectual than the Queen, but she has been intelligent enough to do an excellent job, have a happy marriage and maintain high moral standards herself. She has been an excellent Queen.

    He just wants to be controversial – many people make a career out of this nowadays, unfortunately.

    Who cares what he thinks? I’m sure that the Queen certainly doesn’t!

    Best Regards,
    Lisa

  • http://www.webwritereditor.com/ Lisa

    Hello Mandy,
    I don’t agree with him at all and I think that Starkey tends to take the easy way out in his history which is pretty simplified, so he shouldn’t comment like this! He didn’t discuss whether Richard III really murdered the two princes, for example – he just took it as read.

    I agree that Prince Charles probably is more intellectual than the Queen, but she has been intelligent enough to do an excellent job, have a happy marriage and maintain high moral standards herself. She has been an excellent Queen.

    He just wants to be controversial – many people make a career out of this nowadays, unfortunately.

    Who cares what he thinks? I’m sure that the Queen certainly doesn’t!

    Best Regards,
    Lisa

All original content on these pages is fingerprinted and certified by Digiprove