If you have any questions about the Royal Family, my website, or my network, contact me. My secretary fields all my email.

NEW! You can double-click any word on the Biographies page and a dictionary definition will appear!

Thanks to The Free Dictionary dot com, I can provide my audience with a definition of a word right at their fingertips, without having to link to a ‘definitions’ page.

Soon I will be adding this feature to other pages, so stay tuned …

When someone asked the question “Should the Queen be an empress?” at Yahoo! Answers, I decided to answer them. My response was chosen as the best by voters!

Thanks everyone!

While searching for the BBC’s 1969 program “The Royal Family”, I came across Yahoo! Answers. Someone posted a question which I thought was interesting and should be answered. Correct me if I’m wrong.

Q: An empire is a group of nations with one supreme ruler. The UK contains four countries England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland as well as the Crown Dependencies of the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man. So would the title Britannic Empress (or something similar) be more fitting for our Queen ???

So I responded.

A: The Empire no longer exists, so therefore she could not be referred to as an Empress. The British Empire became a group of countries called the Commonwealth. Some old colonial countries are still a part of the Commonwealth, but India, for instance, left long ago. The Queen is known as Elizabeth The Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith. King George VI, the Queen’s father, was the last King-Emperor.

See what others had to say.

A great question from today’s chat:

Princess Caroline of Hanover is referred to as an HRH and HSH. What is the difference?

[thanks to Brian]

His/Her Serene Highness (HSH) is used in dynasties who have a ruling prince. Caroline was born a Princess of Monaco, the reigning princely house being Grimaldi. Hence her title was “Her Serene Highness”. This style is also seen in the princely family of Liechtenstein.

Since her marriage to Prince Ernst August of Hanover in 1999, Caroline has been “Her Royal Highness”. This is only a courtesy in European royal courts however, since Germany abolished any royal and noble titles in 1918. Legally the titles are considered only as surnames.

His/Her Royal Highness (HRH) is a style used by children of kings, queens, grand dukes, and dukes (non-royal dukes are “Your Grace”). HRH ranks above a Serene Highness in order of precedence.

During my Royal chat session today, a question came up about the Queen. The question was one that was actually already posted at my F.A.Q. section, but I was happy to repost the response.

I can definitely see why this particular issue may be confusing to people. The question was, “Why does the late Queen Mum’s position not count in the order of Queens? There has been the Virgin Queen (Elizabeth I), and now Queen Elizabeth II. They’re not counting the Queen’s mother?”

The “numbering” of a monarch only applies to those who are regnant (reigning). Elizabeth II is regnant – in other words, she is Queen through her birthright, like Elizabeth I. The Queen Mum, however, was only Queen Elizabeth because she was married to a king. A consort only.

Thanks to Joyce for that question!

I will be on Yahoo! Messenger for live question and answer sessions about royalty. Share your thoughts, ask questions, or debate about the monarchy. Starting tomorrow afternoon!

DAILY @ 2:00 pm Eastern Standard Time
(7:00 pm for UK)

Over the summer I will be available for real-time question and answer sessions. I use Yahoo! Messenger as “mandysroyalty” (of course!), so drop me a line anytime!

My frequently asked questions (f.a.q.s) have been recorded and uploaded to RoyaltyNow!. Unfortunately, I don’t think there is a way to embed the sound file into “Mandy’s British Royalty” itself, but there will be a direct link to the post. Enjoy!

Frequently Asked Royal Questions

I received a burning question from a native Briton at YouTube. It’s a great one, and one that I can easily answer.

hey, im british, and i think its really cool that you find our royalty so interesting, because so do i. i think my country is full of history, and of course, being british, we all worship our royal family. i was just wondering why you find our royalty so interesting, and not your own presidents.

British history, from the Celtic Brits to Normans to now, is awe inspiring. Why do I find royals interesting and not my own presidents? Simple. Monarchy is above the petty strife of politics. The Queen sets a mighty impressive example of how to conduct yourself. Not only that, but the pageantry that they lay on is the stuff of legends. The lineage of the royal house IS world history. I could go on, but I’m sure you have things to do!

Simply put, you just can’t get emotional over guys in suits. Bush, Clinton, governors, senators…. a bit blah. How much interest was stirred up by the passing of the baton from Blair to Brown? I’m sure that there was interest politically, but as far as emotional reach and a source of national pride, it was just another day at Number 10. A bit on the boring side, eh? ;-)

But that’s just my opinion. I’ve got a lot of English blood, so maybe adoration of the Royal Family is just in my DNA.

…and comments are always welcome! Since introducing my interactive “f.a.q.s” back in May and the subsequent videos in July, I have had a few comments. Here’s a great comment that brought attention to a previous video: